Legal Opinion

Duckett v. Troester

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1999No. WD 56214PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN H. SMITH, Judge.

Crista Troester appeals from the circuit court’s order granting the respondent, Natalie Duckett, a new trial on her petition for personal injuries. The trial court granted a new trial based on a finding that the appellant had impermissibly injected the issue of insurance into the case.

The appellant raises three points on appeal. She claims that the trial court erred in granting the respondent’s motion for a new trial because: (1) the respondent was not prejudiced by her mentioning of insurance in her testimony; (2) she was immune from suit under the doctrine of official…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Washington v. Barnes HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Kansas City v. Keene Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Ina M. Overton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Chastain v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Koger v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Smith v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. APAC-Mississippi, Inc. v. GoodmanMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Spiece v. GarlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. Hartel v. PruettMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API