Legal Opinion

Reid v. City of Niagara Falls

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn S. Marsh, J.

The defendant has moved, in each of the above-captioned actions, for an order dismissing the complaint npon the ground that the facts set forth therein are insufficient, as a matter of law, to sustain any of the several causes of action alleged. The substance and material allegations of the complaints in each of the above-captioned actions are the same except for the element of damages and the same determination *856of the merits will apply to all actions. These actions arise from a fire that occurred in the City of Niagara Falls on November 16, 1957, resulting in the multiple loss of life and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. Lockwood v. Village of Buchanan, New York County Courts1959
  4. Landby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Motyka v. City of AmsterdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amato v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Carroll v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Spiegler v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API