Cates v. Graham
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
451 So.2d 475 (1984)
Robert B. CATES, Etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
Orlando R. GRAHAM, M.D., et al., Respondents.
No. 63449.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 31, 1984.
Edward N. Winitz of Winitz, Liroff & Kolsky, Miami, and Nancy Little Hoffmann of Hoffmann & Burris, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.
George W. Chesrow of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder & Carson, Miami, for respondents.
McDONALD, Justice.
We accepted this case for review because the decision of the district court, Cates v. Graham, 427 So.2d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), passed upon the constitutionality of subsection 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Purk v. Federal Press Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
3Cited by16 opinions
- University of Miami v. BogorffSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Phelan v. HanftDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Cobb v. MaldonadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Durring v. Reynolds, Smith & HillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.