Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1899No. 1804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of McLennan. Tried below before Hon. John M. Furman, of the Twenty-seventh Judicial District, by exchange. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding before the District Court of McLennan County. There is no agreed statement of facts, nor any formal approval of any statement of facts by the judge. "We quote from the order of the court disposing of the case, as follows: “Ex Parte E. V. Smith. January 5, 1899. On this day came the relator in person and by attorney, and also came the respondent by his attorney, Cullen F. Thomas, Esq., county attorney, and announced ready for trial. Both parties agreed that the hearing be had upon the application alone. After hearing the application read,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hinckley v. PirfenbrinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Ex Parte George Malone.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PalmateerTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ex Parte LathamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Ex Parte KhanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. In re StablerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1924
  5. Ex Parte WestCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API