Legal Opinion

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Pearson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 15, 1946No. 8970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this matter were stipulated before the Tax Court. Respondent’s wife died on April 3, 1936, a resident of Pennsylvania. The residuary estate trust provided by her will named respondent, also of Pennsylvania, as the sole life beneficiary. The eighth clause of the will provided that all estate and inheritance taxes chargeable upon the estate or upon any bequest or trust under the will, be paid by the executors out of “my general estate.” There was no mention in the will as to how interest on any estate or inheritance tax deficiency should be paid. In 1940 a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. John Kelley Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Mellon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. BreyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  5. Penrose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Bahr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  2. Estate of Richardson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  3. In re Estate of MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Bisbee v. FahsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API