Legal Opinion

Herbst v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 13, 1960No. C.D. 2201Published

1Opinion of the Court

LawRENCe, Judge:

Plaintiff herein, a United States resident, on returning from a trip to Europe, brought with him, among other things, a Volkswagen automobile which the collector of customs classified within the provisions of paragraph 369 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 369(b)), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 9 per centum ad valorem.

It appears from the record in this case that upon entry of the automobile in question an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United State v. HutchingsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Levy v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API