Legal Opinion

Greenburg v. Whitney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

The following facts were undisputed. The plaintiff, a customer of the defendants, on March 8, 1920, gave them an order for the purchase of forty shares of Stutz Motor Company stock; and he had on deposit with them the required margin. On the following day he received *305a statement or confirmation that the purchase had been made at $122.25 per share. A delivery of this stock was made on March 9, to F. B. Keech and Company, members of the New York Stock Exchange, who were correspondents of, and executed the order for, the defendants. Keech and Company continued to hold the stock for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Adams v. DickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Secoulsky v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. McKinney v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. McNulty v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Johnson v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Palley v. Worcester County National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API