Legal Opinion

McCabe v. McCabe

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1988No. 1353 and 1354PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is a consolidated appeal. Appellant has appealed from final orders providing for alimony, alimony pendente *453lite, distribution of property and the awarding of counsel fees and expenses.

Appellant has challenged the trial court’s valuation of marital property and distribution of marital property, the awarding of alimony, alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and expenses, and has also challenged the procedure utilized by the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Because we find that the trial court erred in the valuation of marital property, we will affirm the orders in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Hodge v. HodgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. In Re the Marriage of MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCabe v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Gioia v. GioiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. McCabe v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. McCabe v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. McCabe v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API