Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Sarmiento

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1990Published

1Dissent

Carro and Milonas, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Carro, J., as follows: Because the People failed to demonstrate that the vials admitted into evidence at trial were, in fact, the same vials received by the undercover officer from defendant *330in the course of a buy-and-bust operation, the vials and controlled substance contained therein, i.e., cocaine, were inadmissible. As a result, the conviction herein appealed from is predicated upon evidence insufficient to establish every element of the offense charged. Accordingly, because I would reverse the conviction and dismiss the charge, I dissent.

B…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. GambleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API