Legal Opinion

Hansen v. U.S.A.A. Casualty Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1980No. 42583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C. J.

This appeal presents to the court a question of first impression: Whether an insurer, before canceling the insurance covering a motor vehicle owned by several individuals, must give notice, of such cancellation to all the owners even though not all the owners are shown on the face of the policy as the named insured. The trial court concluded that the insurer *148was only required to give notice of cancellation to any owner listed as a named insured and sustained the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. For reasons more particularly set out in this opinion, we believe that the rule should be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. Employers Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Kent v. DAIRYLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hall v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Columbus v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Nordic Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Nordic Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Hansen v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API