Legal Opinion

Ludvigsen v. Town of Dedham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 2, 2000No. 98-P-970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

We affirm a decision of a judge of the Superior Court which holds that the Dedham board of selectmen committed error in denying a “class 2” used car dealer’s license to the plaintiff, John F. Ludvigsen, the alleged ground being that he did not have (to quote the statute) “a place of business suitable for the purpose.” G. L. c. 140, § 59.2 For convenience of reference, we set out in an appendix a (partial) text of this statute describing the basic license requirements and the scope of judicial review; also reproduced is a description of the class 2 license (from § 58).

*6831. The following appeared…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yerardi's Moody Street Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Roslindale Motor Sales, Inc. v. Police Commr. of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Goldie's Salvage, Inc. v. Board of Selectmen of WalpoleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. Executive Office of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  2. Grenier v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  3. Grenier v. Town of ShrewsburyMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API