Legal Opinion

Plehn v. Hollywood-Maxwell Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 30, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, District Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiffs, Henry M. Plehn and Peter Pan Foundations, Inc., for infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 2,535,864. The defendant filed an answer and two counterclaims: the first, for declaratory relief, to have this court declare the patent in suit invalid and not infringed; and the second, to restrain unfair competition and for damages resulting therefrom.

Insofar as the defendant’s first counterclaim, for declaratory relief, is concerned, the issues are substantially the same as those raised by plaintiffs’ complaint, except that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Willetts v. General Telephone Directory Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  2. Colm v. KylesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API