Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Drew

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1922No. 356-3112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.

Defendant in error, Tom W. Drew, instituted this suit to recover of plaintiff in error, Jacob C. Baldwin, upon a promissory note for the sum of $390 and to foreclose a vendor’s lien retained therein on certain lands described in the note.

Plaintiff in error answered, admitting the execution of the note, but alleged that the consideration therefor had failed. He also pleaded that defendant in error claimed the land in virtue of a warranty deed from Tom Moore; but that Moore was insane at the time of the execution of the deed and because of his insanity that no title passed in virtue of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Baldwin v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Graham's Estate v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Warner v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Trico Oil Co. v. PeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Graham's Estate v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Trico Oil Co. v. PeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API