Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Marshall-DeKalb Elec. Co-Op.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 19, 1986No. 84-820PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. Plaintiffs Max and Ila Davidson own a mobile home park that receives electric power from defendant, Marshall-DeKalb Electric Cooperative. When Marshall-DeKalb changed its billing practice so that the Davidsons would be responsible for the electric bills of the residents of the mobile home park, the Davidsons and one of their tenants brought this suit. They alleged that the new billing practice violated the electric power contract between Marshall-DeKalb and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The trial court entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. Board of Water and Sewer Com'rs of City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Holley v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Magic City Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Edward E. Hancock, Cynthia A. Hancock v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Lake Martin/Alabama Power Licensee Ass'n v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Decker v. MARSHALL-DeKALB ELEC. CO-OP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Dennis v. Magic City Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API