Legal Opinion

Exparte Langdon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 15, 1853PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Habeas Corpus, on the petition of John B. Langdon, in which petition he set forth, that he was unlawfully imprisoned in the jail at Montpelier, by virtue of a warrant signed by J. Collamer, Chancellor, dated at Woodstock, on the 14th day of July, 1853 ; and that the relator has never been permitted and allowed an opportunity of defending himself, against the charge of disobedience of the injunction of said Chancellor, and that the hearing on said charge, was exparte, and…

Read the full summary

Habeas Corpus, on the petition of John B. Langdon, in which petition he set forth, that he was unlawfully imprisoned in the jail at Montpelier, by virtue of a warrant signed by J. Collamer, Chancellor, dated at Woodstock, on the 14th day of July, 1853 ; and that the relator has never been permitted and allowed an opportunity of defending himself, against the charge of disobedience of the injunction of said Chancellor, and that the hearing on said charge, was exparte, and without notice to the relator. The order and decree of the Chancellor, was as follows : “ Whereas it appears satisfactorily…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, Ch. J.

Without regard to the disposition of the libel for divox-ce, between the petitioner and his wife, it seems necessary to pass upon the question, of the relator’s discharge. For, although the injunction, only extends to the final judgment of this court in the libel for divorce, and therefore probably, no new process for contempt could be originated, after the' injunction had expired by its own limitation, even for a disobedience which occurred during its continuance, still, one being actually committed for *682contempt by an unlimited order,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yates v. LansingCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1811
  2. Albany City Bank v. SchermerhornNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. M'Credie v. E. & R. SeniorNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  4. People ex rel. Young v. CraftNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  5. People ex rel. Lovett v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1830

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Whittem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. State v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ex parte WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Gandy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API