Legal Opinion

United States v. Dalcour

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1906No. 69PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. The facts are stated in the opinion. This court • has jurisdiction. The appeal by the United States to this court is special and mandatory under § 11 of the act of 1860; therefore the Circuit Court of Appeals Act does not apply. This principle is recognized respecting original jurisdiction under the act of August 13, .1888. Re Hohorst, 150 U. S. 653, .661..

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. The facts are stated in the opinion. This court • has jurisdiction. The appeal by the United States to this court is special and mandatory under § 11 of the act of 1860; therefore the Circuit Court of Appeals Act does not apply. This principle is recognized respecting original jurisdiction under the act of August 13, .1888. Re Hohorst, 150 U. S. 653, .661.. Gwin v. United States, 184 U. S. 669, distinguished. If the Circuit Court of Appeals Act applies, the construction of the treaty is really and…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a petition to establish title by a grant of about one million eight hundred and fifty thousand acres of land in Florida, brought in the District Court under the act óf June 22, 1860, c. 188, § 11, 12 Stat, 85, 87, extended by act of June 10, 1872, c. 421, 17 Stat. 378, for three years from the last date. The petitioners had a decree in the'District. Court, and the United States appealed to this court -under the above-mentioned § 11.

As the jurisdiction of this court is denied, we will dispose of that question before going further into the facts. The ground of the. denial is that by § 6…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. The Paquete HabanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Reid v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State of RussiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HesterlySupreme Court of the United States · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API