Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Midlands Animal Products

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1988No. 87-867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The panel modified the judgment rendered by a single judge of the court. In his petition, filed June 16,1986, plaintiff-appellant, Albert Wayne Elliott, alleged that “on or about the 23 day of April, 1982, the plaintiff sustained personal injury in an accident arising out of and in the course of the plaintiff’s employment by the defendant [Midlands Animal Products].” Plaintiff further alleged that the injury sustained was a “[r]ight hand injury” and that the “accident and injury occurred in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nordby v. Gould, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Coyle v. JanssenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kingslan v. Jensen Tire Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Rodriquez v. Prime Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Clifford v. Harchelroad Chevrolet, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spangler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McDonald v. Lincoln U-Cart Concrete Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Tatara v. Northern States Beef Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Pierce v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pierce v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API