Legal Opinion

Painter v. Painter

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1902No. S.F. No. 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing the sale of assets by a receiver to pay a judgment against him. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order authorizing and directing A. 0. Colton, as receiver of the firm of Painter & Co., in the said cause, to pay the judgment rendered in the superior court of the City and County of San Francisco, in favor of the J. B. Painter Company, as plaintiffs, against A. 0. Colton, said receiver, as defendant, in the sum of $11,085.73, and to sell sufficient of the real and personal property of the said firm of Painter & Co. to pay said judgment. The court found that from October 1, 1865, to February 6,1883, Jerome B. Painter and Theodore P. Painter were…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Security Pacific National Bank v. GeernaertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Mines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. SeurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SymmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Administrative Management Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API