Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Banta v. Kneissel

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment recovered on the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The referee held that the defendant had not been legally appointed to the office of inspector of weights and measures for the first district of the city of New York. Before the appointment of either of the relator or the defendant, the city had by ordinance been divided into two inspection districts (chap. 49, Revised Ordinances of 1845, secs. 1, 2). And while the ordinance was in force and on the 19th of May, 1873, the mayor nominated four persons together to the board of aldermen, as inspectors of weights and measures in the city of New York. At that time there were but two such officers in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Highways of Carmel v. Judges of the County Courts of PutnamNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. People Ex Rel. Aspinwall v. Supervisors of Richmond CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. John Giles Ford v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API