Syracuse Solar Salt Co. v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from special term, Onondaga county. Action by the Syracuse Solar Salt Company against the Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.
Upon the first trial, in 1891, the complaint was dismissed on the merits. An appeal was taken to the general term, and a new trial was granted in 1893, and the opinion delivered *592on that appeal is found reported in 67 Hun, 153, 22 N. Y. Supp. 321. Apparently, the main features of that opinion were followed by the trial judge upon the occasion of the second trial, now brought here by appeal. The trial judge, upon a large volume of conflicting evidence, has found as matter of fact that the line of the 34-acre lot extends to the center of Marsh street, and as a conclusion of fact upon that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. . the New-York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Aldridge v. . AldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Cassin v. . DelanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Fobes v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wolfson v. ChelistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- Wolfson v. ChelistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955