Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Lustberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Merrell, J.:

The action was brought to recover damages by reason of the alleged default of the defendants and their refusal to accept and pay for a quantity of cotton flannel alleged to have been sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. The plaintiff is a converter of cotton fabrics, including shirtings. The defendants are manufacturers of shirts. Owing to war conditions and the high price of flannels, the plaintiff placed upon the market a line of imitation flannels made of cotton and known as “ cotton flannel.” The plaintiff alleges that on October 15, 1918, the defendants, by Max Nast, one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Blackwell v. . FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Cohen v. WolgelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilman v. Broad Brook Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API