Legal Opinion

Simmons v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. T. L. Borom. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Shepherd v. State, 110 Ala. 104; Winslon; v. State. 97 Ala. 68; Wade v. State, 94 Ala. 109; Ward v. State, S8 Ala. 202. cited Ex parte Davis, 95 Ala. 9; Smith v. State, 81 Ala. 74; Shepherd v. State, 110 Ala. 104.

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, J. —

Tlie defendant was indicted, tried and convicted for a violation of section 4751 of the Code, which reads as follows: “Any defendant, on whom a fine is imposed on conviction for a misdemeanor, who in open court signs a written contract, approved in writing by the judge of the court in which the conviction is had, whereby, in consideration of another becoming his surety on a confession of judgment for the fine and costs, agrees to do any act, or perform any service for such person, and who, after being released on such confession of judgment, fails or refuses without a good and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Winslow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Shepherd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API