Legal Opinion

Cortes Co. v. Thannhauser

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 2, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, C. J.

The defendants in these suits have brought two suits at law in this court against the Cortes Company and one suit at law in this court against Lucius E. Chittenden and others to recover sums of money alleged to be due. The above are suits in equity. The first of them is brought to restrain the prosecution of all three of the suits at law, and the second to restrain the prosecution of the suit at law against Chittenden and others. Properly interpreted, there is no prayer in either of the two bills for any relief except injunctions to stay the prosecution of the suits at law. The *227ground stated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Dunn v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  4. Dunlap v. StetsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1827
  5. Bates v. DelavanNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Brun v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Campbell v. Golden Cycle Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Aldrich v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API