Stevens v. Breen
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
While the order of the Appellate Division, reversing the judgment and granting a new trial, was on the law and the facts, it is clear from the court’s opinion that it was made in the exercise of its discretion “ in the interest of justice.” In view of the fact that certain defenses were not raised, in the first trial, which defenses, within reasonable expectation might cause the trial court to arrive at a different result, there has been no arbitrary abuse of discretion by the Appellate Division. Under these circumstances, the reversal and the granting of a new trial by the Appellate Division…
2Cited by4 opinions
- McCarthy v. EmmaNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- East New York Savings Bank v. AlstonNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Karell Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Eller v. Loch Sheldrake Improvement Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948