Legal Opinion

Brill v. Haifetz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1945No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, P. J.,

Rose Haifetz, the defendant, owned four adjoining properties known as 746-746y2 S. 4th Street, and 405-407 Fitzwater Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On July 11, 1941, she leased a storeroom on .the first floor and a part of the second floor of premises known as 746% S. 4th Street to the plaintiffs, Fay Brill and Herman. Brill, for a term of three years from August 1, 1941, at a rental of $95 per month, which was to commence, when certain alterations were completed, which was accomplished August 29, 1941. The Brills did not enter into possession of the leased…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ralph v. DeileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Breuckmann v. TwibillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Rafferty v. KleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Jenkins v. RootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Laska v. ZelazowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kanter v. SafranSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Stonehedge Square Ltd. Partnership v. Movie Merchants, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Onal v. BP Amoco Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Trizechahn Gateway LLC v. TitusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Lawton v. DeAngeloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API