Werner v. State Life Insurance Co.

Dissenting Opinion.

Kime, J.

Since I am firmly convinced that ruling precedents of the Supreme Court are being violated by the majority opinion in this case it is my duty to state what I conceive the law to be as applied to the facts in this case. In the first place the statute says specifically that all policies should be incontestable after two years except for non-payment of premiums. Conceding that the statute is written into and becomes a part of all policies it f ollows then that under the statute this policy could be contested only for non-payment of premiums. The Supreme Court and this…