Bolles v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
2Per curiam
— Mr. Bolles in explaining that he did not understandingly sign the agreement in question, testified that previous to the signing he talked with Mr. O’Brien about a one-fourth interest O’Brien was to take and pay for in lands with Bolles and two others, and that the proposition was abandoned as to the two other persons, “but had not been called off in relation to Mr. O’Brien; and this was a continuation of that.” Bolles also testified that the instrument was kept in a safe place and when more than a year after the signing someone mentioned to him the existence of an agreement…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Keenan v. ScottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Crocheron v. SavageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Grant v. WyattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
4Cited by1 opinion
- Blakely v. YelvingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963