Legal Opinion

Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Haines & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 25, 1990No. 89-2207PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Illinois Bell”) brought suit against Haines and Company, Inc., (“Haines”) for copying information from its “white pages” telephone directory and including it in Haines’ street address directory and thus infringing on Illinois Bell’s copyright. Haines counterclaimed for alleged Sherman Act violations by Illinois Bell. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Illinois Bell on both counts, and Haines appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.

I

Illinois Bell is a public utility providing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Illinois Bell Telephone Company v. Haines and Company, Inc., Haines Criss + Cross Publishers, Inc., William K. Haines, Sr., and William K. Haines, Jr., Haines and Company, Inc., and Haines Criss + Cross Publishers, Inc., Counterclaimants-Appellants v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Counterdefendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Ashkanazy v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. Arndt v. Wheelabrator Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  4. Vukadinovich v. Board of School Trustees of Michigan City Area SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API