Cavanaugh v. Town of Narragansett, 91-0496 (1997)
Superior Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
James Cavanaugh and several other private citizens have brought this action on behalf of themselves and the class described as "everyone who wishes free access to the sea and shore in question ("Plaintiffs") against named defendants the Town of Narragansett ("Town"), the State of Rhode Island ("State") and the Coastal Resources Management Council ("CRMC") alleging that the Town's actions restricting access to the Narragansett Town Beach ("Beach") to those people who pay a beach access fee, violates the Plaintiffs' state and federal constitutional rights.1 Additionally, the Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.