Legal Opinion
Brum Realty, Inc. v. Takeda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered September 10, 1993, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment in the second consolidated action while granting plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment in that action, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the cross motion as well, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
J. Max International Corp. ("JMI”), plaintiff-respondent in consolidated Action No. 2, contracted to purchase a parcel of Manhattan realty from defendants-appellants Takeda for $2.3 million. The terms called for a down payment of $100,000…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maxton Builders, Inc. v. Lo GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Cohen v. KranzNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Schmidt v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Willard v. MercerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- GDJS Corp. v. 917 Properties Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ADC Orange, Inc. v. Coyote Acres, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Highland Credit Opportunities CDO, L.P. v. Ubs Ag, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Cave v. KollarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Scavenger, Inc. v. GT Interactive Software Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001