Legal Opinion
Kumar v. Ford
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 17, 1986No. 85 Civ. 5384 (DNE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This is a diversity action for a money judgment based on three alternative theories: breach of contract, account stated, *36and goods sold and delivered. A default judgment was entered in this Court on January 7, 1986. Plaintiff sought to execute on the judgment in the District Court in Maryland and on or about March 26, 1986, a Writ of Garnishment was served upon Maryland National Bank restraining defendant’s bank account.
Defendant seeks to vacate the default judgment and to dismiss the action based on improper service of process. The motion is granted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. ErdossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Leab v. StreitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Howard Johnson International, Inc. v. WangDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Bicicletas Windsor, S.A. v. Bicycle Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Knox v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Global Gold Mining, LLC v. AyvazianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.