N.A. v. Gateway School District
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARTHUR J. SCHWAB, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Acting on behalf on their autistic children and other similarly situated children, Plaintiffs allege that Gateway School District (“School District”) violated the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act (“IDEIA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1487, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794. Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint asserts that the School District denied their children “free appropriate public education” (“FAPE”) as guaranteed by the Act by failing to provide special education services and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.