William B. Donnell v. E. v. Nash, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Concepts and standards were announced in Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837, and Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770, which neither the state courts nor the lower federal courts had previously been applying in dealing with collateral attacks on state convictions.
Disposition of claims of constitutional violation, which have the capacity to render a state conviction void, cannot now, of course, be properly effected, either by a state court or by a lower federal court, except upon the basis of these announced concepts and standards.
Further,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Clarence Mahurin v. E. v. Nash, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jimmie Baines v. H. R. Swenson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Elijah Wright v. Maryland Penitentiary, State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- George C. Hooper v. E. v. Nash, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- James v. CopingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- Hunt v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.