Legal Opinion

In re Cynthia Pinheiro

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 2018No. 2016-385PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner Cynthia Pinheiro appeals the superior court's judgment for the State with respect to her petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). In her PCR action, petitioner seeks to set aside her conviction for aggravated domestic assault on the basis that the plea colloquy was defective under Vermont Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(c) and (f) because the trial court failed to identify the mental element of the crime (that she acted willfully or recklessly) and to elicit a factual basis supporting that element. We conclude that the plea colloquy was not substantially compliant with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. In Re KasperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. In Re MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bedell v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court · 2020
  2. Davis v. DemlVermont Superior Court · 2026
  3. State v. Peter HirzelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API