Blue Goose Mining Co. v. Northern Light Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The vital point in the case is as to the jurisdiction of the state court of California to render the judgment which the Blue Goose Company complains of. The judgment roll in the state court recited that: W. S. Andrews, Esq., and A. H. Brandt, Esq., appeared as counsel for the plaintiff, and Messrs. Fink and White appeared on behalf of the defendant, and continued: “It appearing to the court that the defendant had been regularly served with a copy of the summons and complaint in said cause in the city and county of S'an Francisco, state of California, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Knowles v. The Gaslight and Coke CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cooper v. NewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Colorado Iron-Works v. Sierra Grande Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Winfield Mortgage & Trust Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Liken v. ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
- Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934