Legal Opinion

Eisland v. New York City Campaign Finance Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered on or about April 18, 2005, which denied the petition to set aside respondents’ determination directing repayment of $142,306 in unspent campaign funds, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted to the extent of excluding $130,000 from petitioners’ repayment obligation, and respondents’ counterclaim granted, in the aggregate amount of $12,306, against all *260petitioners except EISPAC. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Petitioner Eisland is a former member of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Raritan Development Corp. v. SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. MATTER OF FANELLI v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brodsky v. New York City Campaign Finance BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Fields v. New York City Campaign Finance BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API