Legal Opinion
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Employers Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 13, 2009No. Nos. 07-56538, 08-55402Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM***
Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. (“Interstate”) appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of Pacific Employers Insurance Co. (“Pacific”) in which the district court held that Pacific was not required to contribute to the payment of claims arising out of an accident. We affirm.
Based on the notices of appeal filed by Pacific, we have jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see also Fed. R.App. P. 4(a); Cato v. Fresno City, 220 F.3d 1073, 1074-75 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam); Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 630 F.2d 677, 680-81 (9th Cir.1980).
For the reasons stated by the district…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ralph S. Cato v. Fresno City Daryl Balch, and J. Bradin R. Matsumoto, and Michael G. MarderosianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sentry Select Insurance v. Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009