Legal Opinion

State v. Luxton

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The indictment in this case was for obtaining money under false pretences. The pretences set forth were *606that the defendant was the owner in fee-simple of a certain lot of land, and that his title was unencumbered by mortgage or other lien or claim whatsoever; and the falsity of these pretences was alleged in the following words: “Whereas, in truth and in fact the said [defendant] was not then and there owner in fee-simple of the said lot, nor was his title then and there unencumbered by mortgage or other lien or claim, as he then and there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. GatesNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. State v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LamoreauxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. In re the Jersey City & Bergen Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API