Legal Opinion

Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. v. City of Ottawa

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 1, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Debt, for the violation of an ordinance. Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle County; the Hon. Dorrance Dibell. Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the December term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crabtree

This was an action brought by the city of Ottawa against appellant to recover a penalty for failing to erect gates at the crossings of certain streets in the city, which, by a resolution under the ordinances of the appellee, it was required to construct and maintain. By the stipulation of the parties filed in the case, it is admitted tliat the city of Ottawa is duly incorporated under the general laws of this State providing for the incorporation of cities and villages. It is further admitted that the city council of said city, did, on June 21, 1891, regularly pass an ordinance on the subject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. DeaconIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago & Alton Railway Co. v. AverillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API