W.R. Grace & Company v. Continental Casualty Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.2d 865
58 USLW 2576, 59 Ed. Law Rep. 599
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Gerling Konzern Allegmeine
Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft, Granite State Insurance
Co., Guarantee Insurance Co., Hartford Accident and
Indemnity Co., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 88-2902, 88-6164.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
March 6, 1990.
Opinion on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc April 9, 1990.
Kerry L. Neves, Mills, Shirley, Eckel & Basset, Galveston, Tex., Stuart C. Levene, New York City, for Continental Cas. Co.
Gordon R. Pate, Pate & Dodson,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Per curiam.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Virginia v. American Booksellers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, LP v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014