Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Sheppard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 1967No. 66-321PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Sears appeals from an adverse final judgment, after a jury trial, in a slip and fall suit by a business invitee.

Appellants claim that the appellees failed to prove a prima facie case of negligence sufficient to go to the jury and that the trial judge should have granted their motions for directed verdict, for new trial, or for judgment non obstante veredicto.

The record on appeal indicates that there was conflicting evidence concerning the creation of the conditions alleged to have caused the accident. The evidence of negligence here was slight but there was sufficient evidence of negligence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. LarkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R & G Properties, Inc. v. RothbardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Glenn v. GibsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API