BANKERS LIFE COMPANY v. Peterson
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
A decree foreclosed a real estate mortgage. On appeal we conclude that there must be a new trial because plaintiff has not proved that no proceedings at law for recovery of the indebtedness had been had.
Plaintiff’s allegation that no proceedings at law had been had for recovery of the mortgage indebtedness was required, section 25-2142, R. R. S. 1943, and was denied. A mortgagee must establish this negative averment, United Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holman, 177 Neb. 682, 130 N. W. 2d 593, but he may do so by circumstantial evidence. Lyons v. Allen, 88 Neb. 41, 128 N. W. 652; Nielsen v. Central…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- UNITED BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HolmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- State ex rel. Spillman v. Citizens State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Great Western Commission Co. v. SchmeeckleNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Nielsen v. Central Nebraska Land & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Kirby v. ShraderNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western Fertilizer & Cordage Co. v. BRG, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Western Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Heart Mountain Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1966