Legal Opinion

State ex inf. Hadley v. Corcoran

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 2, 1907PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Quo Warranto. (1) The act, with emergency clause, was approved. April 11, 1879. It will he observed that the act does not in terms say that a jury commissioner shall he- appointed in 1879 and every fourth year thereafter, but it does require the appointment of the first commissioner within thirty days from April 11, 1879 (and Ashley Cabell was actually appointed on May 6, 1879) and fixes his term at four years from and after the 1st day of May, 1879. This is equivalent to…

Read the full summary

Quo Warranto. (1) The act, with emergency clause, was approved. April 11, 1879. It will he observed that the act does not in terms say that a jury commissioner shall he- appointed in 1879 and every fourth year thereafter, but it does require the appointment of the first commissioner within thirty days from April 11, 1879 (and Ashley Cabell was actually appointed on May 6, 1879) and fixes his term at four years from and after the 1st day of May, 1879. This is equivalent to fixing a four-year term involving a new appointment every fourth year. State ex rel. v. Pearcy, 44 Mo. 162; State ex rel.…

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is a proceeding by information in the nature of quo ivarrcmho filed by the Attorney-General to test the right of respondent to the office of jury commissioner of the city of St. Louis. There is no dispute as to' the facts in this controversy, hence there is no necessity for setting out in detail the agreed statement of facts disclosed by the record. The respondent in this case very clearly states the facts applicable to the question involved in this controversy.

On April 2,1903, the expiration of the term of the then jury commissioner of the city of St. Louis occurring on May 1, 1903, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gallup v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. State ex rel. Shaw v. WareOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Stadler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. State ex rel. Wingate v. ValléSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  5. People Ex Rel. Joyce v. . BrundageNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ray County Savings Bank v. HuttonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Gracey v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Clark v. State, ex rel. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Applegate v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Kane v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API