Legal Opinion
Gadda v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 2004No. Nos. 02-15113, 02-80014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
On July 30, 2001, the California State Bar Court (the “State Bar Court”) found that Miguel Gadda, Esq. repeatedly failed to perform legal services competently. It placed Gadda on involuntary inactive status and recommended that Gadda be disbarred.
This opinion and order relate to two ■federal proceedings resulting from the State Bar Court’s recommendation. In the first, Gadda appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, which denies Gadda’s motion to preliminarily enjoin the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Public Utility District No. 1 Of Grays Harbor County Washington v. Idacorp Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. IDACORP Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Michigan South Central Power Agency v. Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
- No. 02-15113Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004