Ingraham v. Cox
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
The facts, so far as it is requisite to state them for a clear understanding of the case, are these: Nalbro Frazier was the administrator of one John Harbach, and while he was thus acting, received by a credit considerable money deposited in the Bank of the United States on the 6th of February, 1796, money belonging to the estate of the deceased.
Read the full summary
The facts, so far as it is requisite to state them for a clear understanding of the case, are these: Nalbro Frazier was the administrator of one John Harbach, and while he was thus acting, received by a credit considerable money deposited in the Bank of the United States on the 6th of February, 1796, money belonging to the estate of the deceased. Subsequently to the receipt of this money, viz., in 1804, he made a general assignment of all his property, for the benefit of his creditors, to John Beamy and Daniel W. Cox, who accepted the trust and acted in that capacity. It was alleged and not…
1Opinion of the Court
On the 9th of December, 1843, the opinion of this Court was delivered by
PARSONS, J. —
This is a petition presented to the Court of Common Pleas by Francis Ingraham, as the administrator of John Har-bach, deceased, setting forth that in the year 1804, Nalbro Frazier made a voluntary assignment of all his real and personal estate to John Leamy, now deceased, and to Daniel W.. Cox, in trust for his creditors; that the assignees accepted the trust, and that they received various sums of money. That in the year 1827, the assignees filed and settled their account in the office of the Prothonotary of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drenkle v. SharmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
- Weld v. M'ClureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
- Account of Stevenson's AssigneesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838