Legal Opinion

Clay v. Ford Motor Co

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 28, 2000No. 98-4230Published

1Opinion of the Court

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS  3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH D S 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB '2/25(6 &/$<DV ; $GPLQLVWUDWUL[RIWKH(VWDWHRI  .DWKOHHQ3&OD\ s2+1 '   1R  67520DV$GPLQLVWUDWRURI  WKH(VWDWHRI&KULVWRSKHUs !  6WURP  3ODLQWLIIV$SSHOOHHV   Y    )25' 02725 &203$1<D  'HODZDUH&RUSRUDWLRQ  'HIHQGDQW$SSHOODQW   :,//,$0 5 6/216.<  7KLUG3DUW\   'HIHQGDQW$SSHOOHH   1 $SSHDOIURPWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deborah Jahn v. Equine Services, Psc Scott D. Bennett, D.V.M. Mary Beth Wallingford, D.V.M. And Richard Griffin, D.V.M.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Thomas H. Hisrich, Administrator of the Estate of Diana Zhang v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. Volvo North America Corporation,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API