Patrick v. Davis
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from St. Francis Gi/rewit Gov/rt. Hon. Charles W. Adams, Circuit Judge. "We submit i£hat the purchaser, at a tax sale, 'Cannot -be disturbed by -reason of any irregularity liere alleged': that the -sheriff’s deed is conclusive. Bees. 112, 113, eh. 139, Rev. Btat./ Pillow vs. Roberts, 7 Ark. 822/ ATewtotb vs. State Bcmk, 14 Ark.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
3n opening and examining this record, we were forcibly and very favorably impressed with tbe lawyer-like manner in which this case was gotten up, and is presented for our 'decision by the united professional skill of the learned court and counsel.
It was an action of ejectment by Patrick, who claimed the land in controversy, under sheriff’s deed, made on a sale for taxes against Davis, the patentee andowner. The cause was tried and determined upon the general issue, (before the Hon. Charles W. Adams, Judge,) in the St. Francis Circuit Court, the parties having waived a trial by jury, and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Wallace v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
- Schuman v. Metropolitan Trust CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Cracraft v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Baltzley v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Biscoe v. CoulterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.