Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 1983No. 80-5-197; CA A25048 control; 80-5-198; CA A25049; 81-239 & 81-240; CA A25050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for failure to appear in the first degree and two counts of burglary in the first degree. He moved to dismiss those charges on the ground that he was denied the right to a speedy trial as provided under ORS 135.775, the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. The trial court found that defendant had failed to comply with the provisions of the statute and denied his motion to dismiss. We affirm.

Defendant was incarcerated in the San Mateo, California, County Jail in June, 1981. The Clackamas County District Attorney filed a detainer against him with the San Mateo…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. MiebachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. BillingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TosteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BurssCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. LiefkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API