Legal Opinion

State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The major issue upon this appeal may best be stated by setting forth defendants’ contention with respect to it. It is defendants’ claim that the bonds are not only statutory but official bonds; that the terms of the *182relevant statutes are to be read into the bonds; that the statutes provide that the amount on deposit with any state depository shall not exceed its actual paid-up capital nor one-half the penalty of the bond filed by it, nor the amount prescribed by the board of deposits, if any be prescribed, except that for checking accounts deposits may be made to the amount of the paid-up…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Bakula v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. PedersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Oakland v. Central West Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Jones v. MehlbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Larson v. EngebretsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API