Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Day
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided February 21, 1997No. 95-P-40PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.
The defendant was convicted by a jury in the Superior Court of two counts of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and of unlawfully carrying a firearm.1 On appeal, he claims that the admission in evidence of (1) a police flyer containing the defendant’s photograph and identifying the defendant as “armed and dangerous,” a member of the devil’s disciple gang, and the perpetrator of the crimes of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and (2) a single photograph of the defendant that identified its source as the Greenfield police department and bore notations suggestive…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BotelhoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DayeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. StoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VardinskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. McWilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. SylviaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. PoggiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.